For our IEP program I wanted to approach putting together
materials for our Maine History and Culture class in a new way by using
authentic texts which would offer opportunities for developing written
response while conveying a sense of place about Maine.
Sometimes it can be difficult to find good materials to use in
an ESL classroom. Children’s literature is great, but it can be tricky
to motivate adult learners with something they find childish. In
contrast, materials designed for English language learners may contain
more sophisticated topics but texts can end up feeling artificial. If
carefully chosen, properly supported with prereading preparation and
discussion during the reading, teachers can use authentic materials that
will engage a mature audience. A good reference for this type of
project is Susan Kelly’s (2010) article “Curiosity Didn’t Kill This Cat:
Studs Terkel for English.” Kelly describes how she uses Terkel’s work
to help students, once they have developed beyond the beginner level and
are ready to read and discuss appropriate authentic texts, gain insight
into U.S. culture. Kelly points out that, instead of the graded readers
they are often subjected to, authentic materials present students with a
wide range of themes that are more appropriate for adult learners as
well as being more linguistically complex.
Arguments against using authentic literature in the ESL
classroom focus on the complexity of the literary texts, the use of
colloquial language, outdated language, changes in semantics, and too
many deviations from Standard English. I have rejected some of the
materials I reviewed based on concerns about the comprehensibility of
colloquial language or drastic deviations from standard language. While
colloquial language as part of a text can add richness and convey a
sense of culture or atmosphere (it can also be too much and ruin an
otherwise good story), it is not helpful as a model for students trying
to acquire language skills. However, in small doses, especially common
phrases people are likely to hear in everyday speech, it can be
appropriate.
Unfamiliarity with literary genres is also cited as an argument
against using literature. However, rhetorical models differ from
culture to culture and becoming familiar with them is part of developing
fluency in a language. For students pursuing an undergraduate degree,
an introduction to a variety of writing styles will help them develop
the fluency they need to be successful taking general education
requirements outside of their field of study.
A final argument in favor of reading is writing and what types
of writing assignments ESL students should be given. Are the types of
writing assignments teaching them what they need to know to be able to
write later on in their academic careers?
Describing a study of the types of writing tasks ESL students
commonly encounter, Julia Carroll and Helen Dunkelblau (2011) outline
the argument between teaching about the process of writing versus
teaching field-specific writing assignments. On one side are those who
feel that teachers who taught writing as a process in which students
would discover meaning by producing personal essays were doing students a
disservice, and they recommend that students use content-based
assignments similar to what they would work on in their major. On the
other side are those who believe that a student’s ability could transfer
good writing skills and that English language teachers should not try
to teach about fields in which they were not knowledgeable (Carroll
& Dunkelblau, 2011). The conclusion of their study was not an
endorsement of either side. The main point was that the most important
element was not trying to predict the content of future academic
assignments students might encounter but to teach them how to
“confidently engage with a text” (p. 279) and prepare students to be
successful in whatever courses are required.
Literature can be a safe way to teach students to engage on a
level beyond looking for information that will lead to the right answer.
Students will have to think about the overall meaning and break down
the story to support their conclusions. They will be able to explore
thoughts about the reading in discussion, which will in turn prompt
writing assignments, developing the skills students need to continue
their education.
Example of the Type of Text Chosen: Island Life and Stephen King
I start with Stephen King, because he is probably the most
familiar Maine author. His short story “The Reach” is about a close-knit island community that has aged as
children have left. The main character has a very strong sense of place.
As she relives her memories, it gives the story a sense of time, a
contrast between then and now. King’s descriptions make you feel just
how cold winter can be, and how isolating. The reach is a pretty obvious
symbol so it will be useful for students who have not had experience
discussing literature in this manner. Developing familiarity with the
discussion of symbolism and personal interpretive meaning is important
because it is not common in all educational models. There is also an
opportunity for a writing assignment here in which students could
express their opinions about what the symbolism means, but they would
also have to negotiate extracting meaning from the text and using
examples to support their statements. A close examination of the text
will reveal a comparison of how life has changed (and stayed the same)
on the island and is something students could relate to if thought about
from the perspective of their own home environment across different
generations.
In Conclusion
Literature has been called the “window to the world”; it is the
product of a culture, language in use. Literature widens viewpoints and
perspectives. Literature provides a communicative context for
discussions and writing. Literature and fiction are a safe way to start
exploring thinking critically; there is room to play with different
thoughts, to suppose, to follow a train of logic, it can be as personal
or impersonal as the reader wants. Thoughtfully chosen texts offer a
variety of unique perspectives and authentic language models that can
convey a sense of history and culture in an engaging and productive
manner. Authentic literature enhances the ESL classroom.
References
Carroll, J., & Dunkelblau, H. (2011). Preparing ESL
students for "real" college writing: A glimpse of common writing tasks
ESL students encounter at one community college. Teaching
English in the Two-Year College, 38, 271–281.
Kelly, S. (2010). Curiosity didn’t kill this cat: Studs Terkel
for English. TESOL Journal, 1, 247–260.
King, Stephen. (2005). The reach. In W. McNair (Ed.), Contemporary maine fiction: An anthology of short stories. (pp 255-275). Camden, Me: Down East Books.
Erin-Kate Sousa teaches in the IEP at University of Maine’s Intensive English Institute. |