Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2012). Academic
writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor,
MI: The University of Michigan Press. 418 pages.
Swales and Feak have long established their niche as eminent
and influential experts of academic writing. After 20 years, the third
edition of Academic Writing for Graduate Students continues to build on the success of two previous editions.
Aimed at postgraduates, undergraduates, and junior and senior
researchers, the newest edition shines with a fresh appeal and abounds
with bigger and better features while maintaining some of the previous
favourites.
As in earlier editions, the value of this book emanates from
extensive research literature and classroom experience. The third
edition not only extends teaching tips, but also provides more writing
activities than most instructors could ever use in a semester. Readers
will recognise that there is a clear emphasis on authentic texts from
the hard sciences and engineering. Another valuable feature is the use
of Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP) as examples
and an invitation to access the corpus with over 830 high standard
student papers freely available. The third edition companion Commentary for Academic Writing for Graduate Students
has also stretched to 193 pages of suggested responses to writing
activities, explanatory material for all eight units, and two
appendixes. Each unit of the Commentary features the
main aims and important take-home messages, an inventory of language
focus sections, a list of tasks and general notes, and more detailed
commentary.
The structure of the book remains familiar. Similar to the
original eight-unit organisation in previous editions, the first four
units are preparatory and cover: 1) An Approach to Academic Writing; 2)
General-Specific and Specific-General Texts; 3) Problem, Process, and
Solution; and 4) Data Commentary. The next four units focus on
developing academic writing skills: 5) Writing Summaries; 6) Writing
Critiques, with an expanded section on book reviews; 7) Constructing a
Research Paper l; and 8) Constructing a Research Paper II. The
appendixes have slight variations: Appendix One (The Grammar of
Definitions), Appendix Two (Articles in Academic Writing), and Appendix
Three (Academic English and Latin Phrases).
Academic Writing for Graduates continues to
map typical rhetorical moves and compare authentic texts across
discipline models using new themes and updated tables. Some of the
engaging topics highlight the trend toward scientific texts and include
acoustics, fog harvesting, counterfeit money detection by intrinsic
fluorescence lifetime, and the increasing dominance of teams in
production of knowledge, among others. These newer scientific texts have
not replaced classic favourites such as the general-specific texts on
road rage, procrastination, and theories of humour. The test-retest data
in Chapter Four is still there, too. Updated tables demonstrate the
frequency of appearance of individual moves and interdisciplinary
differences, in addition to common fixed phrase expressions and the
number of hits on Google Scholar as of May 2012. The updated tables
endorse identified moves in academic writing and validate the in-depth
analysis of various academic genres with current research.
One special feature is the focus on part-genres such as
problem-solutions, methods and discussions sections, and genres covered
in the book review and research paper sections. As in previous editions,
each sentence is labelled in model texts and followed by focus
questions so students can analyse and discuss each text as a class, a
small group, or self-access. Student papers from the MICUSP are
highlighted as authentic examples alongside published research. These
features enhance the practicality of the book as a useful genre
reference for academic writing skills.
Another valued and appreciated feature of this enhanced edition
is the focus on “positioning” right from the beginning. The authors
describe positioning as “the means by which you create in writing a
credible image as a competent member of your chosen discipline” (p. 1).
The index lists 17 other references to positioning in this edition, as
opposed to the second edition with only five references, clearly an
indication of the increasing significance of positioning in academic
writing. Positioning is often an area that international students
overlook because of the focus on vocabulary, grammar, and referencing.
Positioning may also be less frequently addressed in academic writing
due to lack of familiarity with the concept and lack of credible
resources. This edition offers exercises and advice on concluding a
commentary by positioning one’s self as “knowledgeable and capable” (p.
172), certainly an advantage to any student, educator, or researcher.
Swales and Feak claim their book “remains a work in progress”
(p. 192) and hint that the fourth edition may be released before the end
of the decade. In an age of internationalisation and English language
education, the marketing of academic writing books often promises much
but actually delivers little. Nonetheless, these two authors have a
highly regarded reputation for pioneering the field, charting the
domain, and conquering the territory. Each consecutive edition is a
cultural artefact highlighting fluidity in the changing scene of
academic research, discipline trends, and the role of higher education
in society. It is a pleasure to highly recommend the third edition of Academic Writing for Graduate Students as a
“knowledgeable and capable” guide in the field of academic writing.
Dr. Sally Ashton-Hay lectures in academic skills
development, Division of Teaching and Learning, at Southern Cross
University in Australia. She was honored to attend Christine Feak’s
presentation “Best Practices in Academic Writing” at Anadolu University
Conference in Eskiṣehir, Turkey in 2005. |