After defining “flipping the classroom,” this article discusses
the key components of a flipped lesson and shares CALL-IS instructors’
concerns and insights which predominantly focus on the global challenge
of student motivation. Here is a sampling of their concerns: Will
students complete the lesson outside of class? Will this help students
achieve greater educational goals? Will they reach our expectations, or
will they just arrive in class with the usual excuses which could be
hashtagged “my dog ate my homework”?
What does “flipping the classroom” mean? As defined by Graney
(2013), the flip is in homework. The homework in a flipped lesson is
what the class work has been: The action of students learning the lesson
now takes place outside of class, thus allowing them more time to
define, repeat, and review as often or infrequently as they need before
coming to class to complete the scaffolded exercises, activities, or
role-plays. It means that students will be engaged in higher order
thinking of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation by receiving their
educational input outside of the classroom. They will read, watch
videos, or listen to recorded podcasts. What does this mean to the
students? Will a majority of them benefit more than from completing
typical homework? Will students be engaged with this type of lesson or
get swayed into a 42-minute game of Candy Crush? Will the lesson be as
valuable to them outside the classroom? They might instead think, “The
teacher doesn’t even want to do it, but makes us do it. This homework
doesn’t matter because the teacher doesn’t even teach it to us.” Will
they embrace it as a beneficial pedagogical innovation?
The aim is that students’ completion of the assignment outside
of class could produce better analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, while
student participation and engagement would improve in class. At home,
students are expected to take responsibility over their learning of the
material so they will be better prepared for what activities will occur
in class the next day. They become “masters” of the material before
completing classroom exercises. The consensus on a common concern of
online CALL-IS commentators was that some proof of completed homework
would need to be required. A number of educational videos, from places
such as TeacherTube or YouTube, have quizzes
integrated into the videos which the teachers could assign for students
to complete and bring to class to satisfy the “homework completed”
requirement.
Educational input specifically in the form of videos has been
closely associated with flipped classrooms. There are two common avenues
for educational videos: preexisting videos and self-made videos. If
you’d like to use what has already been created, you might find
resources such as TeacherTube, YouTube, TED-ED, Educreations, or ShowMe beneficial. If you’d
rather make and edit your own educational videos, there are Screencast-o-matic,Jing, or Camstudio; or with some
funds invested, you could use Camtasia
as well as others (Graney, 2013).
The typical homework, then, in this flipped classroom is
actually classwork: It is conducted in the classroom with the teacher
there to clarify, assist, and correct answers individually, in pairs, or
in small groups. In this way, educational muscle memory comes in to
play. If your class is already run like this, you are ahead of the game;
if your class reflects the more typical model, this is another method
you can consider in trying to gain more instructional time with
students. Because the classroom focus is on students’ application of the
material they learned outside of the classroom, this frees up more time
in class to achieve greater goals. Learners are still the center of the
lesson; their needs, of course, are top priority. With more time to
complete multiple scaffolding of classroom activities, students can make
greater gains in their learning process, which is globally a treasured
educational goal. A noteworthy benefit to the flipped classroom is that
the instructor has more time in class to work and could make greater
progress. To that point, Majumdar (2014) notes administrators and
teachers saw progress in that failure rates drop 20%; dropout rates were
lowered as well. More than 90% of students are graduating, with the
college attendance rate rising by almost 20% by 2012.
Whether the input is in a video, reading, or podcast, common
consensus by faculty in the online discussion is that the course
objectives need to be crystal clear. Furthermore, students should see a
valuable reason for this work as well as for it being learned outside of
class. Many instructors supported and lauded a valid suggestion to use a
rubric as an objective way to evaluate students for completing this
work and for clarifying the criteria. Additionally, the assignment’s
connection to a larger project, unit, or goal was viewed as essential to
its success. Globally, instructors highlighted student motivation, both
extrinsic and intrinsic, as a critical issue which has to be addressed.
An instructor might get better results by providing extrinsic
motivation (say, a grade) when the criteria for class the next day is
met. This could be the impetus to complete what is required if the
student is lacking sufficient intrinsic motivation. More discussion will
need to be pursued to delineate the best ways to instill intrinsic
motivation. This dual-faceted dilemma must be addressed with each
individual homework assignment.
A typical challenge for instructors in flipping the classroom,
then, is determining who has done the assignment outside of class and is
ready to apply the material and complete the exercises in class. Giving
quizzes which encompass the key points of the educational input was
recommended by some instructors. A quick checking of students’ quiz
answers would ascertain those who were prepared to move ahead into
exercise completion. With the traditional classroom homework assignment,
we have questions answered on paper to prove that students completed
the exercises. For the flipped classroom, there can be a similar
requirement: some proof that they have completed the video, reading, or
podcast. Our classes will still, the discussion blog faculty concurs, be
divided into those who are prepared, those who are not prepared, and
those who can do even more than the instructor anticipated. At least
with non-flipped lessons, we knew the students had the educational input
our class activities were based on, yet there can be uncertainty in how
well they understood it.
In conclusion, a common albeit critical thread throughout the
discussion, which was best stated by Sandy Wagner of the Defense
Language Institute, was that when instructors are flipping the classroom
there is “the need to remain true to established teaching practices and
allow the technology to support the learning process.” Many instructors
concurred that this is quintessential.
The phenomenon of flipping the classroom does, in some ways,
address 21st century students’ learning process. As we can see, with
classroom Internet connectivity, students’ learning process takes on a
different form; by the time a relevant question comes up in class and a
few students offer their opinion, another student has accessed the
Internet for the answer. Case in point: In one of my classes, a
reference was made that the tallest skyscraper currently in the world is
the one in Dubai, with a total height of 800 meters. Debate ensued for
approximately 1 minute about whether 800 meters was accurate. Ali and
his iPhone discovered that indeed Dubai’s skyscraper is precisely 830
meters. Discussion over; it all transpired virtually instantaneously.
With the speed of learning at this rate, how can 21st century students
be patient and tolerant enough during a traditional lesson? How can they
feel engaged in classrooms being taught with 20th century teaching
methods?
Are we ESL instructors expecting too much to be completed
outside of class? Or do we simply recognize that with CALL lessons being
flipped outside the classroom, students could become as highly
motivated toward learning as we are in the creation of those lessons? If
you’d like to learn more about the flipped classroom and th 21st
century students’ learning process influenced by CALL, come see my
presentation at TESOL 2014, in Portland, Oregon, in the Electronic
Village.
References
Graney, J. (2013, October). Flipping Your EL Classroom: A Primer. TESOL Connections.
Majumdar, A. D. (2014, January). Flipped Classrooms: A
Technology-Driven Teaching Method. Retrieved from
http://exclusive.multibriefs.com/content/flipped-classrooms-a-technology-driven-teaching-method
Mardelle Azimi is an ESL instructor for the American Language Program, an intensive English program in California State University, Fullerton. She teaches university bound intermediate and advanced ESL students English which is used in science, technology, and engineering majors in the university.
|