Book reviews are always a very popular feature of the
newsletter. Book review guidelines are below. To request or suggest a
book for review and for details, including submission deadlines, please
contact Zhenjie Weng.
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
HEIS News welcomes reviews of scholarly books and textbooks
dealing with English teaching, applied linguistics, second language
acquisition, language assessment, or other disciplines as they relate to
ESL or TESL instruction in higher education settings. Anyone interested
in writing a review for HEIS News may choose a recent book in the field
and contact the editor for approval. Reviews will be considered for
publication based on the quality of the reviewer’s evaluation and
description of the book, and the book’s relevance and importance to the
field.
Reviews should
- be 600–900 words in length;
-
include a 50-word (500 character or fewer) abstract;
-
include a 75- to 100-word bio of the reviewer;
-
follow the style guidelines in the Publications Manual of the
American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition (APA
Manual);
-
be in MS Word (.doc or .docx) or rich-text (.rtf) format; and
-
include a reviewer headshot.
-
Book reviews should be commentary/critical, not merely summary,
and must include elements such as assessment of the writing, the
content, the research/evidence provided, the book’s usefulness, etc. The
summary portion should make up less than half of the text. Following is
a basic academic book review outline from the UNC Writing
Center:
-
First, a review gives the reader a concise summary of the
content. This includes a relevant description of the topic as well as
its overall perspective, argument, or purpose.
-
Second, and more importantly, a review offers a critical
assessment of the content. This involves your reactions to the work
under review: what strikes you as noteworthy, whether or not it was
effective or persuasive, and how it enhanced your understanding of the
issues at hand.
-
Finally, in addition to analyzing the work, a review often
suggests whether or not the audience would appreciate it.
Additional information about academic book reviews from the USC article, "Writing Academic Book Reviews."
|