Action research is a classroom-based, cyclical,
reflection-informed inquiry process in which teachers investigate and
revise their teaching practices. The goal of an action research project
can be to better understand what is going on in the classroom, revise
regularly used teaching approaches, or introduce new practices. It
allows teachers to establish explicit connections between what they
believe about teaching and how they teach and generate more practical
knowledge about teaching. Though action research can be an individual
professional development project, it is conducive to productive teacher
collaboration.
A collaborative action research project can be particularly
useful for teachers in current times, when many of us have to move from
familiar in-class English as an additional language (EAL) and TESOL
instruction to teaching online or in hybrid formats as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, in February–March 2020, the transition
presented a significant challenge, regardless of whether we had had
experience in online teaching or were completely new to it. Our classes
were not set up for online instruction, and our students had not signed
up for online learning. In a matter of several weeks, we needed to move
our classes online; adjust our activities, assignments, and
expectations; set up online assessments; and offer emotional and
academic support to our students. Some educators needed to find ways to
deliver virtual instruction to students with low technological literacy
who did not have regular and reliable access to technology at home. Now,
as the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we are reflecting on our online
teaching as we are planning for the upcoming academic year. And though a
collaborative action research project might seem like a big
undertaking, it can provide a useful framework to revise our online
teaching practices, set up a plan for reflection, and establish a system
of additional collegial support.
In this article, I discuss main principles and stages of action
research and offer a collaborative model that can be suitable for
teachers in current teaching contexts, which may be uncertain and
stressful. I describe three activities that teachers can engage in when
planning their action research projects.
Action Research for Deeper Understanding of Teaching
Action research is an important part of EAL teacher education
and professional development (see Burns, 2009, 2010; Farrell, 2018). It
is cyclical and includes “planning, acting, observing, and reflecting on
an issue or problem in order to improve practice” (Farrell, 2018, p.
119). It can also be used to introduce a new technique, approach, or
series of activities and, through this cyclical process, understand and
evaluate how the innovation is working, what language learning outcomes
it results in, and how language learners respond to it. Further, the
purpose of conducting action research is to bring about a practical
outcome that results in pedagogical and teacher transformation. Through
action research, teachers engage in deep and reflective learning about
themselves, their students, their teaching practices, and their teaching
and learning settings (Farrell, 2018).
Action research projects involve two cycles, and Burns (2010)
and Farrell (2018) suggest the following steps:
- identifying an issue for the investigation
-
surveying current literature, talking to colleagues, and
attending professional development events to understand how this issue
has been studied
-
narrowing down the focus to make the project doable and meaningful
-
choosing methods to collect data
-
collecting data and analyzing and interpreting collected data
- developing an action plan based on the findings
- engaging in the second cycle of reflective investigation in
order to implement and evaluate this action plan
Both Burns (2010) and Farrell (2018) offer detailed steps and
information on how to plan, engage in, and reflect on action research.
In particular, Burns (2010) provides detailed guidelines, questions, and
examples for planning and implementing an action research project.
Though useful, these stages might be difficult for EAL teachers
to complete on their own, especially if they are new to action
research. Now, when many of us are isolated, an action research project
needs to be a collaborative collegial experience. Farrell (2018) finds
collegial friendship and collaboration to be a great source of support
in professional development. Engaging in action research planning with a
group of colleagues will offer a more productive and reflective
process. Keeping in mind recommendations and activities outlined by
Burns (2010) and Farrell (2018), I offer three action research planning
activities that can be completed with colleagues while preparing for the
upcoming academic year.
Three Action Research Planning Activities That Invite Collaboration
1. Connecting Teaching Values and Beliefs With Teaching Practices
Examining our teaching practices and analyzing values and
beliefs that inform them is a useful first step in preparing for an
action research project. Collaborating on this activity is particularly
helpful because it can yield rich conversations about our teaching
values and beliefs and new perspectives on what we do in the classroom.
For example, the teachers can list several teaching acts that
they often use in their teaching. After that, they can identify teaching
values and beliefs that inform these teaching acts and discuss some
overlaps and differences they observe. This collaborative brainstorming
can be done virtually, synchronously or asynchronously, in a Google Doc
or using a mind-mapping or brainstorming platform, like Padlet. This
type of brainstorming has potential to start conversations about values
and beliefs about various aspects of teaching—the concept of a method,
ways of student engagement, classroom management, online synchronous or
asynchronous teaching approaches, multilingual practices, and diverse
representations in teaching materials, to name a few.
Toward the end of this activity, the teachers can identify a
teaching practice that they would like to investigate further in their
action research project. This could be a teaching practice they used
when recently transitioning to online teaching, an often used practice
that needs to be adjusted for online teaching, or a technique they have
read or heard about and have been wanting to incorporate.
2. Writing Research Questions
Writing a clear, concise, and ethical research question (RQ)
that has the capacity to elicit necessary data and information is a
crucial step in action research preparation. Burns (2010) offers a
useful checklist with questions, sample RQs, and explanations of their
appropriateness for an action research project. She proposes the
following questions to discuss when formulating RQs:
- Does the question have the right scope?
-
Is the question closed or open-ended?
-
Is the question biased?
-
Does the question allow for a logical connection between the action and the outcome?
-
Does the question lend itself to data collection?
-
Does the question relate to current research?
-
Is the question ethical?
-
Is the question stated clearly and concisely? (Burns, 2010, pp. 32–33)
This process lends itself to a productive collaboration with
colleagues, collective brainstorming of RQs, and work to narrow and
refine them.
3. Establishing a Framework for Reflection
Reflection is an integral part of action research. At the
beginning of the process, it allows the teachers to identify teaching
practices they want to investigate. At the end, it provides space to
reflect on the process and outcomes of the intervention. Here, I find
the Describe-Analyze-Evaluate framework inspired by the classic
Describe-Interpret-Evaluate exercise in intercultural communication (see
Nam & Condon, 2009) particularly useful. Teachers can go over
the questions (Table 1), discuss and analyze their teaching acts, and
evaluate the outcomes at the beginning of the project and then again at
the end, thus making the action research cycle complete. This is another
collaborative activity for teachers that can be completed synchronously
or asynchronously in a Google Doc or Padlet.
Table 1. Teacher Reflection Activity Following the Describe-Analyze-Evaluate Model
Describe |
Analyze |
Evaluate |
What did I do? – What were my teaching acts?
What did the students do? – How did they respond to my teaching acts? |
Why did I do it?
- What teacher beliefs informed this act?
-
What theory/ies informed this act?
-
What teacher experiences informed this act?
-
What learning objectives informed this act?
Why did the students respond this way? How do I know? |
- What tells us that the teaching act was successful?
-
What tells us that the teaching act was not successful?
-
What do I need to change in this teaching act?
-
Why do I need to keep it?
- Why do I need to change it?
|
(Table adapted from Vinogradova & Ross, 2019)
The three action research planning activities presented in this
article embrace teacher collaboration and create a framework for the
teachers to reflect on their teaching practices, formulate clear and
ethical RQs, and prepare to engage in deeper reflection at different
stages of the two action research cycles.
Conclusion
Action research offers educators a framework to explore new
teaching practices and approaches, monitor and reflect on them, and
develop our own personal theory of practice. In times that require rapid
action and adjustment, considering an action research project might
seem intimidating and unreasonable. However, collaborating with
colleagues through the action research process can yield productive
explorations where teachers can learn a great deal about their teaching
practices and find ways to prepare for a new teaching reality.
References
Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher
education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The
Cambridge guide to research in language teaching and learning
(pp. 289–297). Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English
language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2018). Reflective language
teaching: Practical applications for TESOL teachers (2nd
ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Nam, K. A, & Condon, J. (2009). The DIE is cast: The
continuing evolution of intercultural communication’s favorite classroom
exercise. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
34, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.09.001
Vinogradova, P., & Ross, E. H. (2019). Fostering
volunteer ESL teacher identity through reflection on apprenticeship of
observation. TESOL Journal, 10, e480. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.480
Polina Vinogradova, PhD, is director of the TESOL
Program at American University. Her research interests include
pedagogical uses of digital stories, postmethod pedagogy, and advocacy
in language teacher development. |