The Intercultural Communication Center (ICC) at Carnegie Mellon
University (CMU) has been researching correlations between the TOEFL
Speaking score and international teaching assistant (ITA) assessment
scores since 2005. We use this research to give guidance to the ITAs
themselves and also to guide departments in their admissions of
potential ITAs as well as their expectations of those ITAs once they
have started in their programs.
Since 2005, the ICC has been collecting the TOEFL Speaking
subscores for incoming graduate students. We verify the scores, then
compare them to the students’ scores on CMU’s in-house ITA test. After
13 years of collecting scores, we feel confident that we have a clear
understanding of what the TOEFL Speaking subscore means in reference to
the CMU environment. Our center tests more than 600 students per
semester, thus over several years we were able to assemble more than
1,000 quality samples for our internal analysis. In conjunction with our
data, we also used data from Educational Testing Service, the makers of
TOEFL. We have begun to use our research to assign the language
certification score for many ITAs for their teaching assistant
jobs.
Table 1 shows which TOEFL scores are correlated with which ITA
certification scores. The students or departments can choose to use the
student’s Speaking score for the certification, or they can ask for a
performance test. The table helps the students and departments decide
which assessment is best for each student
Table 1 shows the correlation between TOEFL Speaking scores
and, based on that score, what we anticipate their ICC ITA test score
would be. In this chart, Pass is the top score; Restricted I allows ITAs
to teach recitations; Restricted II allows ITAs to teach office hours
or assist in labs: Not Ready means students are not yet able to work
with students.
Table 1. Correlation Chart
TOEFL Speaking |
Ability to
Handle Academic Communication Tasks |
Rating if Using
TOEFL Speaking Score; Likely ITA Test
Rating |
Pass |
Restricted I |
Restricted II |
Not Ready |
≥ 28 |
Has a strong mastery of oral
proficiency. Might select ICC work to develop cross-cultural
communication techniques. |
✔ |
|
|
|
26–27 |
Has a high level of oral proficiency;
able to communicate in most academic situations; may need to improve
pronunciation, field-specific vocabulary, or cultural
understanding. |
|
✔ |
|
|
22–25 |
Has the oral proficiency needed for
basic academic work, but should take ICC training to prepare for tasks
requiring higher levels of fluency (e.g., giving presentations, working
in interactive research teams, serving as a teaching
assistant). |
|
|
✔ |
|
18–21 |
Has the basic oral proficiency needed
to begin academic work, but needs ongoing language support to continue
to develop robust academic fluency. |
|
|
|
✔ |
Note: ICC = Intercultural Communication Center; ITA = international teaching assistant.
So how do we use this research to inform ITAs and their departments?
-
Admitting new students: We use this
research to advise departments before they admit new students. Because
there is no graduate dean at CMU, each graduate department makes its own
admissions guidelines, including which cut-scores are acceptable for
their specific program. The ICC has developed TOEFL guidelines that are
revised each January that give both recommended and minimum scores for
admission. We also include the chart (Table 1) so that departments will
be able to predict if a potential student will be able to fulfill their
ITA requirements. With the information in the TOEFL guidelines,
departments can make informed decisions.
-
Realistic language expectations: We also
give departments a way to help students set their expectations about
language before the students accept their admissions. In the past,
students have complained that they did not know before they came to
campus that they were expected to take an ITA assessment, or that they
may have to take classes to prepare for it. Students would typically say
“I thought when I was accepted to CMU that my English was good enough
to study here. I didn’t know that I would have to do a lot of extra
work.”
ICC has developed a template for departments to include in
their admission letters that explains what kind of fluency is needed for
success in U.S. graduate programs; announces the student will have to
complete an ITA certification; gives them information about the ICC, as
we are the ITA training and testing center on campus; and recommends
that the admitted student go to the Incoming
Student page on our website, which outlines work that they
can do to prepare themselves before coming to CMU.
-
Certification options: The ICC also
dedicates a significant portion of its website to getting information to
preservice ITAs. We give the students the same information that is
presented in Table 1 on the Registration
page for the ITA certification. They are given a choice between using
their TOEFL Speaking score or our in-house test to be cleared. We spell
out clearly what each score means and which score band they will fall
into if they use the TOEFL option. Note that we have been fairly
conservative in selecting these TOEFL scores; students always have the
option to ask for a test if they think their fluency has changed. We
also include a chart
that details the language capabilities expected in each score band.
-
Orientations for incoming students:
Another way that we get this information out to the wider campus is
through sessions called Language Support Orientations. These are
one-time 1-hour sessions that are run multiple times throughout the
beginning of the semester. The students bring a verified copy of their
TOEFL score (e.g., their score report), which we then use to collect
verified scores. The orientation offers guidance about what their TOEFL
scores can tell them about their own readiness for academic work, a
discussion of common language and cross-cultural issues for graduate
students, and reviews what support the ICC provides.
We have gotten very good feedback from the departments on our
correlation chart; they feel it makes admission decisions more robust
and gives valuable information about the expectations they can have
about incoming students. Using the TOEFL Speaking scores to clear
students to be teaching assistants empowers the students to make
decisions about their own needs. The ICC will continue to collect the
speaking subscores to ensure that the information on recommended scores
and the levels of scores needed for ITA clearance are accurate.
Rebecca Oreto is the associate director of the
Intercultural Communication Center at Carnegie Mellon University and has
held a variety of leadership positions in TESOL’s ITA Interest Section.
Currently, she is the strand coordinator for the Listening, Speaking,
and Pronunciation Strand in TESOL. She is the founder of the annual ITA
Professionals Symposium and hopes you will
attend in 2019. |