TIRF, The International Research Foundation for English
Language Education, is the first organization to be singularly concerned
with investigating issues in language learning and teaching. It is a
nonprofit focused on generating research in the field of TESOL. In July,
TIRF will be offering a professional development workshop for program
administrators, which inspired Program Administration Interest Section
(PAIS) newsletter Coeditor Lara Ravitch to interview Dr. Kathi Bailey,
Chair of the TIRF Board of Trustees and President of the
foundation.
Lara Ravitch (LR): What kind of research does TIRF
support that is related to program administration?
Kathi Bailey (KB): While program
administration is not an identified research priority for TIRF, all our research
priorities may be relevant to administrators’
responsibilities, depending on the context in which they work. For
instance, there are many contexts, such as university-based intensive
English programs, that serve as “lab schools” for the university’s
teacher training programs. So the research done on the stated priority
of “language teacher education” would be relevant to administrators in
that context.
Another example would be the TIRF research priority, Digital
Technology in Language Education. Program administrators must
often make decisions about whether to invest in hardware and/or
software to upgrade their programs’ curricula. The studies TIRF has
supported on this broad topic could be relevant to administrators facing
those kinds of decisions.
Yet a third example would be the priority of Language
Planning and Policy. Program administrators often determine
local programmatic policies. But they must also answer to top-down
policies set by their institution; their region, state, or province; or
even by national bodies, such as ministries of education. Thus, research
on language planning and policy would be relevant to program
administrators in some situations as well.
LR: I understand that TIRF's latest research
priorities are (1) content-based instruction (CBI) and (2) teaching
English to young learners. Are you interested in research on
administering programs that fit those descriptions or are you focusing
primarily on language acquisition and classroom pedagogy? Are there
other research priorities that you might see as a good fit for those
interested in research on program administration?
KB: Based on my program administration
experience and my reading of the literature, I feel that curriculum
design and assessment are two major responsibilities of program
administrators. Both of these issues are important and worthy of
investigation in content-based instruction contexts and in teaching
young learners—so yes, there are connections between these priorities
and the work of program administrators.
But other TIRF research priorities have connections to program
administrators’ roles as well. For instance, the priorities of language
assessment and English as a medium of instruction could be foci for
program administrators who wish to do research on these areas. We would
encourage any program administrators who are completing their doctorate
to consider applying for a
TIRF Doctoral Dissertation Grant. Full descriptions of
individual TIRF research priorities along with how these areas of
research can be investigated can be found at this
link.
LR: What advice would you give to program
administrators in terms of how they might benefit from TIRF, whether as a
resource for themselves or for classroom instructors in their
programs?
KB: I think TIRF’s Resources page
and the TIRF
publications would be particularly useful for program
administrators to share with teachers. The TIRF Resources page includes
links to journals and language-related organizations, calls for papers
and presentations, and reference lists on over 200 topics of current
interest, as well as a range of free resources for teachers. These
resources include practical links to a wide range of materials and
activities for listening, speaking, pronunciation, reading, writing, and
grammar; technology tools for teachers; rubric-building tools; and
language assessment information.
A few years ago, TIRF published six papers about
MALL—mobile-assisted language learning. They can be downloaded for free
by clicking
here. Any program administrators who are considering using
mobile devices, or language teachers who want to learn about using
mobile devices, could benefit from reading those reports.
LR: I understand that you, David Nunan, Jun Liu, and
other accomplished contributors are donating your time for an upcoming
workshop on program administration, the tuition fees for which will go
to support TIRF. How do you hope to use the funds that you
generate?
KB: Unlike many foundations, TIRF doesn’t
have an endowment, so we need funding to cover our day-to-day expenses.
What are those expenses? TIRF has only one staff member: Ryan Damerow is
our chief operating officer, so paying his meager salary is our main
operational expense.
Trustees are not paid. They even pay for
their own travel and lodging associated with attending TIRF board
meetings. The main use of the foundation’s income is to support the
Doctoral Dissertation Grants (DDG) program, and we are eager to continue
that program and help it to grow.
Beyond our DDG program, we are constantly evaluating other
areas of need in our field. We would like to continue to identify and
research areas of our profession that have emerged or will emerge as
critical areas of concern. For example, immigrant issues in language
education is a hot topic and we would like to find ways to address it.
We are also concerned about the preservation of indigenous languages. In
addition, we have been working on plans for the “TIRF Language
Education in Review Series,” so we are eager to advance this
initiative.
LR: What made you decide to support TIRF with a
workshop on program administration, in particular?
KB: We decided to focus on the skills and
knowledge program administrators need for two main reasons. First, David
and Jun and I all have experience and expertise in these areas and all
three of us were eager to help and willing to donate our time. But more
importantly, program administrators are often in the position to
generate positive change through their leadership. We want to reach out
to people who are motivated to implement research-based decisions in
language programs because the potential multiplier effect can be very
powerful. Part of TIRF’s mission is to “promote the application of
research to practical language problems”—and practical language problems
are what program administrators deal with on a day-to-day basis.
LR: What are you most excited about in terms of the
upcoming workshop? What do you think are some of the things that
participants should really be looking forward to?
KB: I am excited to work with motivated
program administrators (and future administrators) from around the world
who wish to pursue their own professional development and to share what
they learn with the teachers in their programs. I am also eager to
learn from them about the contexts in which they work—both the
challenges and the rewards. The participants can look forward to a
highly interactive and informative 2 weeks at Stony Brook University.
They will be working with people who care deeply about language learning
and teaching, and who have held many administrative leadership
positions in their careers. I invite interested individuals to learn
more about the TIRF-Stony Brook Professional Development for Program
Directors initiative by clicking
here.
LR: Is there anything else that you'd like to share
about the intersection of TIRF and program administration? Or about TIRF
in general?
KB: I would encourage program administrators
to visit TIRF’s website (www.tirfonline.org) and
explore the resources available there. In addition, anyone who wishes to
receive our free monthly e-newsletter, TIRF Today,
can do so by clicking
here. Lastly, we always look forward to engaging with our
supporters on our
Facebook page.
Lara Ravitch is coeditor of the PAIS
Newsletter. She has worked as an instructor and administrator
in language education in a number of contexts, including community
college, K–12, and intensive English program. |