As teachers, we want students to grow in autonomy and
self-awareness as they accomplish their academic goals. One aspect of
self-awareness—mindfulness—is positively impacting a number of
disciplines, including education and language learning. Ellen Langer,
Harvard professor and best-selling author of Mindfulness (2014; Merloyd Lawrence), defines mindfulness as “the process
of actively noticing new things[emphasis added],
relinquishing preconceived mindsets, and then acting on the new
observations[emphasis added]” (Feinberg, 2010).
Applied
linguistics and communication faculty Houston and Turner (2007) have
written of its seeming merit in second language acquisition, as well. Mindful language learning is is a task-based approach that “[recognizes] the
need to apply learner knowledge to some task
[emphasis added] in order to promote a more complete integration of
systematic knowledge and to improve retention of that
knowledge[emphasis added]” (Houston & Turner, 2007).
The goal of mindful learning goes beyond simply acquiring knowledge; it
enables students to see the “language world” from their own
perspectives, make observations about their skills, and empower them to
act on their own conclusions (Houston & Turner, 2007). Another
goal Houston and Turner (2007) write about centers on encouraging
students to rely on themselves, not just on experts, as they determine
their own desirable outcomes from tasks.
How do we integrate mindful learning, empowering students to
apply knowledge and improve retention? To move in this direction, I took
a presentation in my advanced speaking/listening class and created a
multilayered project in which students observe their own presentation,
grammar, and pronunciation skills and act on their
observations.
Presentation Self-Awareness
Scaffolding
Throughout the semester, we spend time focusing on presentation
skills. When we begin the persuasive speech, many students have already
given their informative speech in class. As a result, they have had
some previous presentation practice and are accustomed to giving each
other feedback based on criteria I provide.
Project Description
Students are asked to describe a problem or issue they have
read about, observed, or encountered related to their programs, American
culture, or something about our university. After developing the
problem, students provide a practical solution in a video-recorded, 7-
to 9-minute speech. Students upload it to Box and, this
time, they view their own speeches in order to provide themselves with evaluative feedback. To do so,
students create a 4- to 5-minute video summary of their feedback about
the structure/organization of their speech, their performance, language
skills, and overall assessment. They conclude with suggestions that they
would like to keep in mind for future presentations.
Goal and Assessment
The purpose is for students to practice giving a video-recorded
persuasive speech and then assess their own presentation by reviewing
their own recordings, detailing what skills or behavior they would like
to retain or change in the future.
For my evaluation, I watch their video-recorded persuasive
speeches and assess them based on a rubric that I use for all of their
speeches/presentations. I also evaluate their self-awareness videos,
looking for thoughtful comments regarding what they noticed or learned
about themselves and how this awareness will inform their future
presentations.
Grammar Self-Awareness
Scaffolding
The next piece of this project centers on students’ spoken
grammar. At the beginning of the semester, we practice transcribing and
analyzing a speech segment: First, students listen to a short segment
and individually transcribe it. Afterward, working alone, they analyze
their transcription, identifying and correcting errors they noticed.
Finally, with a partner, they compare their transcriptions and analyses
before we discuss them as a class.
Students also have the opportunity to deepen their practice
within their grammar groups: A peer from their group is randomly
selected to give a 2-minute impromptu “talk” on a topic. Students record
and then transcribe it individually, identifying and correcting grammar
and vocabulary errors. As a group, they come to consensus on the errors
and corrections and together fill out a simple identification
chart.
Project Description
At this point, students are fairly comfortable with
transcribing and analyzing speech for errors. Using their persuasive
speech recordings, I ask them to transcribe a 2-minute selection of the
introduction/body and a 2-minute selection of the body/conclusion. After
transcribing both segments, they identify and correct errors using the
error identification and correction chart. Finally, they re-record those
segments, free of the grammar and vocabulary errors they identified in
their analyses.
Goal and Assessment
The purpose is for students to actively notice the frequent
grammar and vocabulary errors in their spoken English and grow in their
ability to self-monitor and self-correct.
To evaluate, I look for their ability to determine mistakes in
their speaking and for their ability to self-correct. I assess how
thorough they are in their transcriptions and write in any errors they
might have overlooked. As well, I evaluate their error identification
and correction charts for accuracy and completeness, especially looking
for thoughtful awareness of their spoken grammar mistakes and whether
they know how to self-correct through either internal knowledge or
access to external information. Finally, I listen to their re-recordings
to assess their ability to mindfully correct the mistakes they
initially observed.
Pronunciation Self-Awareness
Scaffolding
I spend some time teaching pronunciation skills, including word
stress, reduction, thought groups and phrasal stress, linking,
intonation, and vowel and consonant sounds. We also study discourse
markers and their meanings and purposes.
Project Description
The pronunciation self-awareness project includes choosing one of the transcriptions students already completed
in their grammar and vocabulary analysis. Before they listen to their
recordings, I ask them to mark the following on a clean copy of their
transcription:
- Thought groups
- Phrasal stress
- Intonation patterns
- Places where they think they should link
- Places where they think they should reduce
Next, they listen to that segment of their persuasive speech
and mark what they actually hear with a different
color of ink. Finally, I ask them to listen again and note any discourse
markers.
Goal and Assessment
The goal is for students to apply what we have studied and
practiced as a class to their own pronunciation and to actively notice
areas where they are already fairly comprehensible or may wish to focus
on for improvement.
I evaluate this by meeting with students individually during
class time. First, I ask them what they learned about their
pronunciation skills—anything they are doing well and/or anything they
think they should change. Next, we go over their marked-up
transcriptions in detail and compare both sets of markings. This is
typically where students have the “a-ha” moments regarding their
pronunciation and comprehensibility strengths or challenges. Finally,
students have the opportunity to speak that segment of their
presentation “live” with me while I provide individualized
feedback.
Reflection and Feedback
I have found this project to be a wonderful opportunity for
students to grow in awareness of their presentation, grammar, and
pronunciation skills. Instead of relying solely on my feedback, students
actively assess and monitor areas they would like to focus on or
change.
To avoid overwhelming students, I do not present all the pieces
of this project at once. Instead, the pieces are listed on the syllabus
as separate projects due at various times throughout the semester. I
also provide plenty of input, scaffolding, and practice beforehand. As
well, I give students time in class to work on their projects in case
they have questions or want my input or feedback on some aspects of
their work.
Often, students tell me they feel nervous because they have
never watched themselves give a presentation. Afterward, however,
students articulate how much they benefitted from this self-assessment.
They never noticed, for example, that they frequently touch their noses
or use so many fillers. Sometimes the feedback their peers and I provide
them after in-class presentations is not always remembered or acted
upon, but when they notice something for themselves, this awareness
seems to make its mark and motivate them to change.
Students also grow in their awareness of spoken grammatical
errors. Through this project, they typically have a good sense of what
their top spoken grammar (or vocabulary) errors are and how to correct
them. In future speaking situations, students are mindful of these
errors, often unobtrusively self-correcting in the middle of their
spoken discourse.
I really enjoy it when students become aware of something
without my feedback. After completing her pronunciation self-awareness
project, one student told me she was pausing in the wrong places—in the
middle of thought groups instead of between them. As a result, she felt
like her speaking was halted and unnatural, making it more difficult for
people to understand her without some effort. I loved that she became
mindful of this issue on her own and wanted to intentionally fix this in
order to reach her comprehensibility goals.
I believe this integrated project provides a practical way for
students to integrate mindful language learning as they become aware of
their own strengths and weaknesses in ways that involve their real
speech. Students are also given the opportunity to determine desirable
language outcomes for themselves based on their self-assessments and to
find their own sense of meaning as they grow in their language
abilities. As Houston and Turner (2007) write, “Mindfulness asks
students to see for themselves, personally determine how to use their
knowledge or skills, and determine what a meaningful outcome is.” A
mindful approach to language learning is a beneficial approach for
helping students to practically use and retain their knowledge in
self-empowering ways.
References
Feinberg, C. (2010, September-October). The mindfulness
chronicles. Harvard Magazine. Retrieved from http://harvardmagazine.com/2010/09/the-mindfulness-chronicles
Houston, T., & Turner, P. K. (2007). Mindful
learning and second language acquisition. Academic Exchange
Quarterly, 11(1). Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-165912649/mindful-learning-and-second-language-acquisition
Julie George teaches in Penn State University’s
Intensive English Communication Program. Previously, she was the
acting/assistant director at Bowling Green State University’s ESOL
Program and director of a nonprofit organization. |