Make It Stick: Speaking Corrections That Stay With Students
by Alice Llanos and Amy Tate
Mistakes are a normal part of the learning process. In fact,
we want our students to make mistakes because that means they’re trying out
language and seeing what works and what doesn’t work. When students are
speaking spontaneously in the classroom and make these inevitable and beneficial
mistakes, we’re faced with a slew of options for how to respond. We might
ignore them, especially if we are focusing on fluency rather than accuracy. But
if we decide we want to address student mistakes in speaking, we have a lot to
consider.
Correction Considerations
1. HOW Will We Correct Them?
-
Will we reformulate the statement for students,
giving them the correction?
-
Will we prompt students with a gesture or a
question, asking them to figure out and produce the correction?
-
Will we do this orally or write it down?
The good news is that all types of corrective
feedback can make a positive difference, so we would advise mixing it up,
depending on the objective. For example, if our objective for a task is to have
students use the past tense, then we might make students work for the
correction by prompting with a question or gesture. However, if a student puts
the stress on the wrong syllable of a word, we may give the student the
correction directly. When reformulating for students, we make it clear that
it’s a correction because studies show students don’t always recognize that a
reformulation is an actual correction (Lyster et al., 2013). We often do this
by having the student repeat the correction to us.
2. WHEN Will We Correct
Them?
You can give the correction as soon as it happens
or you can collect a few mistakes during a class period and review them with
everyone at the end of the session. You can also provide written feedback the
next class period. Again, flexibility with the timing of corrective feedback is
imperative because there is not a one-size-fits-all approach. It is not always
beneficial to interrupt the flow of conversation. However, if your objective
for a speaking task is focused on using a specific structure, correcting
immediately might be the most effective approach.
3. WHAT Will We
Correct?
Interestingly, studies show that while teachers
love to give grammar feedback, it might not be the best use of our time (Mackey
et al., 2016). Students tend to pay attention to and remember feedback on
vocabulary and pronunciation. This makes sense, as these types of mistakes are
more likely to cause a communication breakdown in the real world, as opposed to
grammar mistakes (like verb tenses or articles), which a listener can figure
out more easily from context. Consider what is most beneficial to the student
you’re working with, which may be correcting a commonly used word that has been
mispronounced or suggesting a better word or phrase.
4. HOW MUCH Will We
Correct?
-
Every mistake?
-
A few mistakes?
-
One per student?
The answer is most likely more. Studies indicate students want more oral feedback
than teachers generally want to give (Lyster et al., 2013; Roothooft &
Breeze, 2016). As previously mentioned, there are certainly times when
interrupting a conversation or discussion to give corrective feedback won’t be
appropriate, but it is helpful to reflect on how much feedback we give in a
typical class (recording yourself teaching can reveal this) and think of how we
could add more.
Making the Feedback Stick
As you can see, the literature on corrective
feedback is full of tips for teachers. All the things we
should do. But it isn’t as detailed about what our students should do with the feedback we give them. How do
we keep feedback from going in one ear and out the other? How do we make it
stick?
Our goal lately has been to make our feedback
stickier, and we think the best way to do that is not just
giving students more feedback, but also providing them a fresh opportunity to
use the feedback we’ve given. The repetition with a familiar (but not
identical) topic and task gives them the chance to use a language form or a
vocabulary word again and to hopefully get it right the second time. Think of
it like the writing process, where students revise and submit a final draft
based on our feedback.
It may seem contradictory—that we’re asking
students to revise spontaneous speech, but the variation
in the topic or partner ensures that they have an opportunity for a new
response.
The following three activities share this common
theme and take advantage of the technology available on every smartphone: a
recording device. There are plenty of ways to apply this to your own teaching
situation and students, whether in person or online. While these activities are
written for an in-person setting, they can all be adapted to virtual teaching
by using breakout rooms for pair and small group work.
Activity 1: Discuss and
Summarize
Students work in pairs or small groups to discuss a
topic. It could be the discussion questions after a reading, a conversation
about their weekend plans, or responses to a list of prepared questions
(Appendix A). Circulate (or visit breakout rooms online) to collect common
mistakes.
After 10–15 minutes, everyone regroups and you put
the mistakes on the board. Mistakes are categorized as G (Grammar), P
(Pronunciation) or V (Vocabulary). Make sure you have some of each, especially
pronunciation and vocabulary feedback, which, as we mentioned, can make the
biggest impact on students. After discussing the mistakes and their
corrections, students record themselves alone summarizing their group
conversation. This gives them a second pass with the topic, plus the
opportunity to use the language reviewed as a class.
Activity 2: Converse and Correct
This activity could take place on the first day of
class as a twist on the classic “get to know a partner and report back,” or it
could be used as a warm up at the beginning of class. Students have a 5-minute
time limit to talk to a partner about a topic that is personal to them (family,
education, job, hobby, likes/dislikes, friends, travel experience, etc.). They
record the conversation, and, later, you listen to the recordings and note
common mistakes with grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary. Also note mistakes
made by each student on individual feedback forms (Appendix B).
During the next class period, lead an all-class
discussion about the general mistakes, and then students listen to their
recordings with their same partner to catch and correct any mistakes they made.
After this, return the individual feedback forms, and students take time to
correct those mistakes as well. Finally, students are paired with a new partner
and record a new 5-minute conversation with the same topic as before, giving
them a fresh opportunity to incorporate the corrective feedback.
Activity 3:
Self-Evaluate
In this final task, the work of finding and
correcting mistakes is all up to the student. In partners, students receive a
list of questions that will require them to use a specific language form (verb
tense, gerunds, adjective clauses, modals, etc.) or vocabulary items (Appendix
C). Students record their discussion, then replay it and listen for their use
of the targeted language form. They can use a checklist to keep track of their
correct usage. Following this self-evaluation, students are paired with a new
partner, where they discuss the same or similar questions, with the opportunity
to use the correct language.
In all these activities, students get a second
chance to complete a task after some type of corrective feedback. This ensures
that the feedback isn’t placed on a back shelf of the mind or in the trash can,
but is used immediately after being received, for a chance to make it
stick.
References
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013).
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language
Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
Mackey, A., Park H. I., & Tagarelli, K. M.
(2016). Errors, corrective feedback and repair. In Hall, G. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp.
499–512). Routledge.
Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A
comparison of EFL teachers' and students' attitudes to oral corrective
feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335.
For Further
Reading
Kerr, P. (2017). Giving feedback on
speaking. Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series. Cambridge
University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Cambridge-Press_Whitepaper_Feedback_Speaking_2018.pdf
Alice Llanos began her teaching career in Tokyo, Japan and now resides in Houston, Texas, USA where she has been working at Rice University since 2006. She develops and teaches courses for several of Rice University’s ESL programs, including the Intensive English Program, online certificate programs, and Coursera.
Amy Tate is a professor of ESOL at Lone Star College Montgomery, in Conroe, Texas, USA. She earned her MATESOL from the New School. Amy frequently presents at conferences, with an emphasis on activities that increase student confidence, fluency, and accuracy in speaking.